When I say I don’t necessarily disagree, that means I can see his reasoning. That I can understand why Connor thinks the way he does, and why he believes that Matches might be a threat to the integrity to our group as a whole.
But that also doesn’t mean I’m throwing Matches under the proverbial bus. You said you trust my judgment? Then my judgment is this: he won’t go out of his way to endanger us, that he talks big but has given us no reason to actually believe that he’s reckless. In that sense, I agree with you.
So you can see the issue, being pulled between two modes of understanding, between two people who aren’t seeing eye-to-eye.
And I don’t consider you a hypocrite, Clarke. If you’re keeping an open mind about everything, like I’m trying to similarly do, then that’s all anyone can ask. That’s all I can ask of you.
no subject
But that also doesn’t mean I’m throwing Matches under the proverbial bus. You said you trust my judgment? Then my judgment is this: he won’t go out of his way to endanger us, that he talks big but has given us no reason to actually believe that he’s reckless. In that sense, I agree with you.
So you can see the issue, being pulled between two modes of understanding, between two people who aren’t seeing eye-to-eye.
And I don’t consider you a hypocrite, Clarke. If you’re keeping an open mind about everything, like I’m trying to similarly do, then that’s all anyone can ask. That’s all I can ask of you.