saviorexe: (Default)
oh my rA9, it's robojesus. ([personal profile] saviorexe) wrote2018-09-04 06:13 pm

INBOX.



@markus.manfred | ■ ▲ ◌ ▼



strove: (I can make some frosting!)

[personal profile] strove 2019-01-18 04:57 am (UTC)(link)
Just don't be surprised if he doesn't make it easy on you.
strove: (no - only jeff goldblum needs one)

[personal profile] strove 2019-01-18 06:42 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not friends with everyone having a difficult time.

So, just you and Connor. He wasn't very interested in hearing what I had to say.
strove: (teal was a much better aesthetic)

[personal profile] strove 2019-01-18 06:54 pm (UTC)(link)
[She deliberates on how much detail to get into here.]

We don't see eye to eye on how to handle potential problems like Matches. I don't want to cause problems here, and I assume the two of you have already spoke of his intentions.
strove: (plus Aaron Judge is hot right)

[personal profile] strove 2019-01-18 07:30 pm (UTC)(link)
[No, and she doesn't want to do the same. Clarke considers her words. It's hard to speak of this without making it about Connor's decisions or what she perceives to be incredible irrationality there. After a few long moments, she puts together a reply.]

I want to help you with Matches because I trust your judgment when it comes to him. Or rather—I want to trust your judgment. Until he acts in a way that actually puts us at risk and doesn't involve talking a big game, that's important. I've seen what happens when someone doesn't.

I understand Connor's stance. And your stance. But until someone acts in a way rather than just talking about it, we can't begin to speak of exiling one of our own. It can't even be on the table. There are too many unknown variables.

You asked me to keep an open mind about what I do moving forward. To not just see this all ending in killing whoever's responsible. And I am. I'm trying. I will. That's behavior informed by my life before, so I'd hope that you and Connor can do the same. And yes, I'm opposed to his solution because I've seen what happens in my world, but I don't think that makes me a hypocrite. Because I've made that mistake before.

More than anything, we've got to be careful about giving Matches a reason to think he's right. That he will just be pushed aside. And if it wasn't Matches and were, say ... me? Because you know what I'm capable of, even if Connor doesn't. Or an idea of it. I won't act irrationally, but sometimes a reasonable person can craft what seems to be a reasonable response in their head when everything's gone wrong. Or they can be so used to certain actions that they don't know anything else.

I guess I'm freewriting here. I don't want you to think that I think I'm at risk. I'm not. But we need to consider the precedent here because I have a feeling I've taken a lot more lives than Matches has. That's all.
Edited (clarifying the "his") 2019-01-18 19:32 (UTC)
strove: (should I start a patreon?)

[personal profile] strove 2019-01-18 07:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Not disagreeing can mean two different things. Especially when a friend is involved.

I'll be honest here. If Connor acts, I will push against it. I'm not saying that when he doesn't know. I think he has the idea now. I made it pretty clear.

I just feel bad because that makes you pulled between three people. It's not fair to you.
strove: (but isn't playing Jesus kind of boring?)

[personal profile] strove 2019-01-18 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)
If nothing else, no one will ever say I can't be objective.

[Given that Connor and Markus are both her friends ... and Matches decidedly isn't.]

I'll do what I can to keep it from getting to that point.